Fragrance Profile

Reviews of Tom Ford for Men (2007)
by Tom Ford

  • Availability: In Production
  • Perfumer:
  • Bottle Designer:
View the main Tom Ford for Men page.

Negative Reviews of Tom Ford for Men

Showing all 8 Negative reviews

Show all of the Tom Ford for Men reviews


Add your review of Tom Ford for Men


49 reviews

I can't help but feel a little disappointed by Tom Ford for men.
The "cologney" opening offers a promise unfulfilled. It aspires to a Colonia Intensa character with zesty citrus notes and a woody-leather-floral heart but unlike the AdP product it just fades from my skin in less than an hour. It is well blended but I just can't accept the total lack of longevity.
This is my first thumbs down.
23 October 2008


2163 reviews

Smells like a designer scent more than a niche. Too bad it doesn't last long because I think it smells much better than most niche fragrances. A clean, flowery scent. Just doesn't last.
28 September 2008


36 reviews

Great smell but no lasting power, at least not on my skin! It was gone within the hour!!!
13 May 2008


648 reviews

For all the hype, this is a disappointing (and very short-lived) fragrance. It’s certainly masculine but in a run-of-the-mill sort of way. If you love subtle scents, which require constant re-application, this one may be for you.
10 April 2008


112 reviews

This starts off fresh, sweet and orangy. But, gudzooks, no sooner had I walked out of the store, and it's gone! Did my skin absorb it like a sponge or had I just sprayed water? Just because you can design clothes, doesn't translate easily into having a good nose to make perfumes - from rags to frags.
29 December 2007


41 reviews

Too fruity and overpriced. I think this guy is so overrated. His scents fall in the dreaded unisex category. I still think Sean John is the best American scent. Unforgivable rocks. Tom Ford is an overrated designer in my opinion and this scent and Black Orchid are perfect examples of that. Way overpriced.
14 December 2007


346 reviews

Top: lemon leaf, italian bergamot, mandarin, basil, violet leaves, ginger
Mid: orange flower absolute, black pepper, tobacco leaf absolute, grapefruit flower
Base: deep amber, cedarwood, virginia patchouli, vetiver, oakmoss, leatherwood resin, cypriol root.
Well the Ford website has lots to look at and you can play with the image of the bottle to get the above information. In my opinion – all hype, no substance. All these rare and specific products jumble together into a vague, sweet, powdery, slightly stale cloud. The only good thing about this is the brief orange opening. Everything after that is yawn and yuck: yawn over what we’ve seen in so many other current men’s fragrances, yuck over the awful vanilla note that is headache-inducing. So many interesting ingredients! So poorly executed! Try the Ford-designed Rive Gauche for something interesting, avoid this lame product.
03 December 2007


10 reviews

HOT GLUE!!! Like the sticks of glue that you insert into the back of a hot glue gun, like the kind you get at a craftstore! That's the first impression I got from testing this! HOT GLUE!!! Think about it... think about it...
27 November 2007

Add your review

You need to be signed in to be able to post your review and access other features. If you are not yet a member you can register here — it's free and simple. Registered members can sign in here

Related Tom Ford for Men products on eBay

The aim of Basenotes is to collect as much information about as many perfumes as possible. If you have any further information about Tom Ford for Men by Tom Ford that you wish you share, click here. Although Basenotes strives to be as accurate as possible, errors and omissions may occur. This page may contain links to Internet stores and/or eBay. Basenotes is not connected with these sites and make no guarantees and accepts no responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, and any future consequences. This page may contain opinions about Tom Ford for Men by Tom Ford from our visitors. These are the views of the credited author alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Basenotes
 
© copyright 1999 - 2008 Basenotes • www.basenotes.net • BCM Box 1111, London WC1N 3XX, United Kingdom
c